MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036096189

Growth and Goals: Independent

2020· article· en· W3036096189 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alison B. Flynn, Elizabeth Campbell Brown, Ellyssa Walsh, Emily O’Connor, Fergal O’Hagan, Gisèle Richard, Kevin Roy, Robyne Hanley-Dafoe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindsetAutonomyContext (archaeology)Active learning (machine learning)PsychologyResource (disambiguation)Mathematics educationKnowledge managementPedagogyComputer sciencePolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This module can be used by anyone in any context and is intended to help you become a more proficient learner, whether in academic, physical, artistic, or other contexts. As an open education resource, it can also be adapted. The Growth & Goals Module is developed by members of the Flynn Research Group at the University of Ottawa. The Flynn Research group is primarily focused on Chemistry Education Research (CER) and works to develop innovative tools and methods to support students learning. The Growth & Goals module is a Self-Regulated Learning (SRL), Growth Mindset, and Metacognition Module for post-secondary learning and beyond. The module allows students to address their strengths and weaknesses, to identify their current mindset towards their goals and learning, and to develop the SRL skills necessary to take control of their learning. University students have to learn in many different formats, often confront failure, and manage many different courses and life expectations simultaneously. To be successful, students need to know and continually monitor their learning plus develop autonomy and professional capacity skills. The Growth & Goals module aims to help students with this and to develop the framework and skills necessary to manage their learning and be successful in a post-secondary setting. For more information, visit our website here.The Growth & Goals Module is developed by members of the Flynn Research Group at the University of Ottawa. The Flynn Research group is primarily focused on Chemistry Education Research (CER) and works to develop innovative tools and methods to support students learning. The Growth & Goals module is a Self-Regulated Learning (SRL), Growth Mindset, and Metacognition Module for post-secondary learning and beyond. The module allows students to address their strengths and weaknesses, to identify their current mindset towards their goals and learning, and to develop the SRL skills necessary to take control of their learning. University students have to learn in many different formats, often confront failure, and manage many different courses and life expectations simultaneously. To be successful, students need to know and continually monitor their learning plus develop autonomy and professional capacity skills. The Growth & Goals module aims to help students with this and to develop the framework and skills necessary to manage their learning and be successful in a post-secondary setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1520.093

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207