Revealing the Structural Evolution and Phase Transformation of O3-Type NaNi<sub>1/3</sub>Fe<sub>1/3</sub>Mn<sub>1/3</sub>O<sub>2</sub> Cathode Material on Sintering and Cycling Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O-type layered oxide cathode materials can be easily synthesized for a full sodium stoichiometry with high specific capacity, but they all suffer from a capacity fade on cycling. The sintering process control and optimization are critical to ensure a high quality and consistency of the prepared cathode materials with stable structure. Herein, in situ high-energy X-ray diffraction (HEXRD) was first employed to investigate the phase evolution of the oxides during the sintering process of O3-type NaNi 1/3 Fe 1/3 Mn 1/3 O 2 . The in situ HEXRD and both operando Bragg coherent diffraction (BCXD) and coherent multicrystal diffraction (CMCD) were utilized to investigate the phase transformation of the cathode materials during the sodiation/desodiation process. A composite structure comprised of O-type and P-type oxides was formed after the initial electrochemical activation of the cathode material, resulting in good structural and electrochemical stability. This finding implies that strain engineering can be a new design philosophy for the development of next generation high-performance sodium ion cathodes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".