MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036157213 · doi:10.1016/j.aim.2022.108508

Quadratic types and the dynamic Euler number of lines on a quintic threefold

2022· article· en· W3036157213 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sabrina Pauli

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Mathematics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNorges ForskningsrådRéseau de cancérologie Rossy
KeywordsQuintic functionMathematicsEuler's formulaFermat's Last TheoremLine (geometry)Quadratic equationType (biology)Euler number (physics)Field (mathematics)Mathematical analysisSection (typography)Pure mathematicsCombinatoricsGeometryEuler equationsBackward Euler methodNonlinear systemSemi-implicit Euler methodPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide a geometric interpretation of the local contribution of a line to the count of lines on a quintic threefold over a field k of characteristic not equal to 2, that is, we define the type of a line on a quintic threefold and show that it coincides with the local index at the corresponding zero of the section of Sym^5 S^* -> Gr(2, 5) defined by the threefold. Furthermore, we define the dynamic Euler number which allows us to compute the A^1-Euler number as the sum of local contributions of zeros of a section with non-isolated zeros which deform with a general deformation. As an example we provide a quadratic count of 2875 distinguished lines on the Fermat quintic threefold which computes the dynamic Euler number of Sym^5 S^* -> Gr(2, 5). Combining those two results we get that the sum of the types of lines on a general quintic threefold is 1445<1> + 1430<-1> in GW(k) when k is a field of characteristic not equal to 2 or 5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in MathematicsSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207