Bibliographic record
Abstract
He is one of the falcon gods worshipped in Egypt, as many falcon gods worshipped through Egypt like Horus, Re, Re Horakhety, Montu, Sokar, Sopdu, Dedwen, Dwan anwi and Nemty. He is worshipped in khem (Letopolis). (M)Khenty irty is considered a universal god, whose eyes are the sun and the moon like god (Her wer).[i] He was known also as (M) Khenty n irty [ii](the one without two eyes in his face) or the blind one. He has a dual nature, sighted and blind. He was worshipped as Khenty-Khem (foremost one of Khem). Khenty-irty is associated to god Her wer (the elder Horus), Shu, and god Montu. The research aims at Spotting light on god (m) Khenty (n) irty and its role in the Egyptian Religion. The study identifies the different forms of this deity and the different forms of his name, referring to the sacred texts, where (m) Khenty (n) irty is mentioned. [i] David Klotz, Adoration of the Ram : five hymns to Amun-Re from Hibis temple, New haven, 2006, 161 [ii] (M)khenty n irty associated to The shrew mouse and other blind animals lived under the ground, while (M)khenty irty associated to the Ichneumon and other animals having sharp eyes; see A. K. Eyma, C. J. Bennett , A Delta-man in Yebu , Canada, 2003, 218
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".