MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036192297 · doi:10.32370/ia_2020_06_17

Content Transformation of Improvement of Qualification of the Teachers of Philological Disciplines in the Kherson (1944-1958)

2020· article· en· W3036192297 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
В. В. Кузьменко, Ganna Chukh

Bibliographic record

VenueIntellectual Archive · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilologyPeriod (music)Space (punctuation)PopulationComposition (language)SociologyHistoryLiteraturePhilosophyArtDemographyLinguisticsGender studiesAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article on the basis of archival materials reveals the peculiarities of the formation of the system of advanced teacher's training of philological disciplines of the South of Ukraine in 1944-1958, in particular in the Kherson region. It is established that in the studied historical period the determining factor of this educational branch was the focus on updating the content of education, based on veiled russification, ideologization of language and literature education in the region without taking into account the polyethnic composition of the population. Analysis of archival data reflecting the results of the system in this period, gave an opportunity to determine the specific features of this period, potential, results and existing contradictions, made it possible to identify positive trends that are relevant for extrapolating the experience of postgraduate education of teachers of philological disciplines in southern Ukraine, in particular in the Kherson region, in the modern educational space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntellectual ArchiveSame topicMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207