MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3036212979 · doi:10.3138/ctr.183.012

A Clown of His/Her/Their Own: Clown and Gender Performativity

2020· article· en· W3036212979 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jacqueline Russell

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsGender studiesPerformativityTabooIdentity (music)PleasureSociologyAgency (philosophy)ArtAestheticsAnthropologyPsychologyPolitical scienceSocial scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feminist clown and scholar Margaret J. Irving suggests that the feminist clown uses her body strategically, as a site to examine gender identity and challenge patriarchal discourses. This article examines the feminist clown performance strategies found in the work of contemporary Canadian clowns Candice Roberts, in her solo show Larry (2018), and Heather Marie Annis and Amy Lee, in their duo show Morro and Jasp Do Puberty (2008). In these performances, we find feminist clowns engaged in an inquiry into gender identities, using their bodies as sites of political agency and inquisition. These artists highlight the permission that clown offers them, to take up space and explore taboo topics. Their work further reveals how pleasure in the body can be weaponized as a political act.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0120.036
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre Review→Same topicDiversity and Impact of Dance→French-language works237,207→