MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036214810 · doi:10.1002/aisy.202000072

Opportunities and Challenges in Soft Robotics

2020· article· en· W3036214810 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Intelligent Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoboticsArtificial intelligenceSoft roboticsRobotComputer scienceAutomationConformable matrixHuman–computer interactionEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soft Robotics has emerged as a new and rapidly evolving interdisciplinary research area. This technology can provide a wide range of opportunities to create machines with unprecedented mechanical functionalities, as well as robots that are intrinsically safe to interact with human beings. However, the potential of this technology has not been fully realized as it is still a significant challenge to design, model and control such robots. This special issue, building on a workshop co-organized by the guest editors at the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation in Montreal, Canada, focuses on recent advancements in soft robotics. The set of accepted papers highlights the opportunities and critical challenges of this field. Successfully realized soft robotics technologies could have a major impact on numerous industries and human activities (1900166, 1900171). Indeed, soft robotics offers the potential to be much more conformable and adaptable through novel sensing (1900080, 1900171, 1900178, 2000002; see Figure 1 A,B) and actuation mechanisms (1900177, 1900163; see Figure 1 C,D). As a result, these robots will be able to demonstrate significantly higher dexterity and manipulation capabilities than their traditional rigid counterparts. For example, grippers/gloves with embedded soft sensors that can empower service robots to manipulate a broad range of objects (1900080; see Figure 1 A) or enable computational proprioception and task identification (2000002; see Figure 1 B). Bio-inspired soft robots can also significantly benefit search and rescue and exploratory operations as they can potentially negotiate across much more complicated terrestrial and aquatic terrains with soft bodies (1900183, 1900154, 1900186; see Figure 1 E,F). Furthermore, soft robotic technologies could be used to create highly functional magnetically controlled devices, which can potentially change minimally-invasive surgeries and targeted drug delivery (1900086; see Figure 1 G). This special issue of Advanced Intelligent Systems is aimed at both roboticists and material scientists. Based on a rigorous peer-review process, we have selected a set of papers that illustrate the inherent interdisciplinary nature of, and the diverse approaches being adopted within current soft robotics research. We hope that the Special Issue will stimulate researchers currently working in soft robotics, and also encourage other researchers to engage this emerging and challenging area. Hamid Marvi received his B.Sc. from Iran University of Science and Technology in 2004, M.Sc. degree from Clemson University in 2009 and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 2013. He was a postdoctoral fellow at Georgia Tech and then at Carnegie Mellon University till August 2015. Since then, he has been an Assistant Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Arizona State University. His research aims to study fundamental physics behind interactions of biological and robotic systems with their surrounding solid, granular, and fluidic environments. Guo Zhan Lum received his B.Eng. from Nanyang Technological University in 2010. He went on to pursue his postgraduate studies under the dual Ph.D. program of Nanyang Technological University and Carnegie Mellon University. He received his M.Sc. degree from Carnegie Mellon University in 2015, and dual Ph.D. degrees in 2016. From 2016 to 2017, he was a post-doctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems. He is now an Assistant Professor at Nanyang Technological University and his research interests include soft robots, miniature robots and biomedical devices. Ian Walker received the B.Sc. from the University of Hull, England, in 1983 and the M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Texas at Austin in 1985 and 1989, respectively. He was an Assistant and Associate Professor at Rice University from 1989 to 1997. Since 1997, he has been with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Clemson University, where he is a full Professor. Professor Walker's research centers on robotics, particularly novel continuous backbone “continuum” and soft robots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.552

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it