MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036262080 · doi:10.7202/1069718ar

L’expérience vécue de personnes ayant des incapacités en visite dans un centre commercial rénové

2020· article· fr· W3036262080 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Geneviève de Repentigny-Roberge, Guylaine Le Dorze, Tiiu Poldma

Bibliographic record

VenueEnjeux et société Approches transdisciplinaires · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’accès à un lieu public représente un défi pour les personnes ayant des incapacités au Québec. Une approche inductive a permis de saisir en temps réel l’expérience vécue de six personnes ayant des incapacités explorant un centre commercial partenaire après que des rénovations y aient été complétées, et ce, dans le contexte du Laboratoire vivant de réadaptation. Deux types de données ont été collectées : des notes à propos des réactions et des commentaires des participants ainsi que des photographies. L’analyse a donné lieu à neuf thèmes relatant l’expérience des participants et à une liste des obstacles et des facilitateurs selon les facteurs de l’environnement de la Classification internationale du fonctionnement, du handicap et de la santé (CIF). Les résultats montrent que les rénovations ont réduit de nombreux obstacles liés à l’accessibilité physique des lieux et que des expériences positives de participation et d’inclusion sociale sont maintenant vécues dans ce centre commercial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnjeux et société Approches transdisciplinairesSame topicAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207