The influence of audit committee characteristics on impression management in chairman statement: Evidence from Malaysia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After the emergence of financial scams like Enron, WorldCom and Toshiba, the researchers have emphasized the significance of the audit committee (AC) in curtailing the earnings management (EM). The role of the AC in financial reporting has received significant attention in accounting research because it offers information to shareholders for investment decision making. Researchers have examined whether AC characteristics mitigate managers’ EM practices. Whereas there is a scarcity of research that investigates the association among ACs and impression management (IM). The objective of this research is to examine the relationship between the AC characteristics and IM practices in the chairman statement of the Malaysian companies We used IM as the measure for financial reporting quality (FRQ). Secondary data is utilized that is obtained from the annual report and Thomson Reuters Database. The sample of this study comprises companies listed on the Main Market of Bursa Malaysia in 2017–2018. Interestingly, this research findings identify that AC independence has a significantly negative relationship with the level of IM measured on the basis of qualitative scores (IMSC1) and quantitative scores (IMSC2). The findings of this research supported the agency theory because it argues that strong internal governance monitoring mechanisms improve the FRQ and decrease the IM. AC meeting has a significant positive association with the level of IM based on qualitative scores (IMSC1). This result does not support the argument that increasing number of ACs meetings results in reduced IM and enhanced FRQ. Also, the AC meeting has no relationship with the level of IM in the quantitative scores (IMSC2), whereas IM and AC size has no association with AC financial experts. This result may not support the argument of the agency theory that AC size, meeting and financial experts significantly enhances the FRQ. Findings of the study may enable regulatory bodies and policymakers to devise policies and strategies to improve the credibility of financial statements in Malaysia. Future studies may consider the effect of other AC characteristics, like AC quality, AC members’ ownership and AC members’ remuneration on IM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it