MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036288370 · doi:10.33137/rr.v43i1.34107

Chesney Zegura, Elizabeth. Marguerite de Navarre’s Shifting Gaze: Perspectives on Gender, Class, and Politics in the Heptaméron

2020· article· en· W3036288370 on OpenAlexaffvenue
François Paré

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGazePoliticsClass (philosophy)HumanitiesSociologyGender studiesArtCartographyHistoryGeographyPsychologyPolitical sciencePsychoanalysisPhilosophyLawEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

comptes rendus 219 melody is clearly audible throughout and would easily have called to mind, in those who knew them, festive processions and solemn Eucharistic devotions.Tierno shows how the impact of this melody was gradually altered by means of a German language version of the text, now free of any mention of transubstantiation; and the function of the Missa itself was altered through incorporation into official Lutheran worship services.Thus, a piece of music that did not look promising at all from the point of view of Reformation theological controversy (even if composed by Luther's favourite composer) could yet be retained and reimagined-as a kind of musical spoil of the Egyptians.Alongside the concern for music used in divine praise (whether in church or at home), a couple of chapters present developments in the theory of music.Hyun-Ah Kim's chapter on musica humana shows how the tradition of musical contemplation flowing from Boethius could become a rich spiritual discipline in the Swiss Reformation.Inga Mai Groote demonstrates the afterlife of Melanchthon's theorizing on the affective properties of music in the work of theologian and pedagogue David Chytraeus (1530-1600).The book is handsomely produced and comes with a generous supply of images-usually pages from manuscripts or printed books-and tables.Musical examples are fewer and well introduced and explained.It is regrettable that a book as rich in data as this should have no index; admittedly, some readers, or their institutions (mine not among them), may choose to invest in the ebook, which will make tracking of names and places easier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicRenaissance Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207