MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3036300374 · doi:10.1101/2020.06.16.20128660

Potential involvement of monoamine oxidase activity in delirium onset and SARS-COV2 infection

2020· preprint· en· W3036300374 on OpenAlexaff
Miroslava Čuperlović‐Culf, Emma Cunningham, Anu Surendra, Xiaobei Pan, Steffany A. L. Bennett, Mijin Jung, Bernadette McGuiness, Anthony Peter Passmore, David Beverland, Brian D. Green

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeliriumMonoamine oxidaseDementiaMedicineInternal medicinePsychiatryEnzymeChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Delirium is an acute change in attention and cognition occurring in ~65% of severe SARS-CoV-2 cases. It is also common following surgery and an indicator of brain vulnerability and risk for the development of dementia. In this work we analyzed the underlying role of metabolism in delirium-susceptibility in the postoperative setting using metabolomic profiling of cerebrospinal fluid and blood taken from the same patients prior to planned orthopaedic surgery. Significant concentration differences in several amino acids, acylcarnitines and polyamines were found in delirium-prone patients leading us to a hypothesis about the significance of monoamine oxidase B (MAOB) in predisposition to delirium. Subsequent computational structural comparison between MAOB and angiotensin converting enzyme 2 as well as protein-protein docking analysis showed possibly strong binding of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to MAOB resulting in a hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 influences MAOB activity possibly lead to many observed neurological and platelet-based complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This proposition is possibly of significance for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of vulnerabilities causing delirium, dementias and severe COVID-19 response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19→French-language works237,207→