Estudio bibliométrico de los trabajos especiales de grado sobre cirugía presentados de la Facultad de Odontología de La Universidad de Los Andes, 2005-2017
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oral and Maxillofacial surgery is that specialty of dentistry that deals with the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases, trauma and functional or aesthetic defects, congenital or acquired hard and soft tissues of the oral and maxillofacial region. For this reason, it represents an area of importance, especially when students conduct research as a requirement for the presentation of the special degree work, which can be analyzed by bibliometric markers. The objective of this study was to analyze the behavior of bibliometric indicators in the special degree work at the Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Los Andes (FOULA) between the years 2005- 2017 in the area of Surgery. It was analytical research of documental design, where the production indicators were described by years and tutor’s area, as well as the thematic and methodological content indicators. An analysis of the methodological structure was also carried out. The sample was made up of 53 theses on surgery. They were carried out in ten different subjects. It was found: Vancouver as a reference style, the quantitative approach, the type of descriptive research, longitudinal and experimental designs, observation as a data collection technique and descriptive statistics. There were 87% errors in taxonomic classification including misuse of methodological authors. It is concluded that it is important to establish a better interaction among professors of the Department of Research and the subject of Surgery at the FOULA since an excess of methodological errors was observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | Bibliometrics Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
| gpt | Bibliometrics Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".