MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Application of Stochastic Frontier Gravity Approach (The Case of Iran's Potential Agricultural Exports)

2020· article· en· W3036352893 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shokrollah Hajivand, Reza Moghaddasi, Yaaghoob Zeraatkish, Amir Mohammadinejad

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontierGravity model of tradeAgricultureEarningsFood securityPopulationInternational tradeBusinessEconomicsAgricultural economicsInternational economicsGeographyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agriculture plays a crucial role in Iranian economy in terms of food supply, job creation, food security, and foreign earnings. The main purpose of this study is to provide an estimate of the country's agricultural exports potential and to determine how efficient Iran is in realizing this capacity. Using data for 38 destination countries for the period spanning from 1982 to 2017, proper stochastic frontier gravity model was estimated. Main findings revealed direct and significant impact of trade partners' GDP and population on Iran's agricultural exports, while distance and border barriers imposed by destination countries show significant reverse effect. Furthermore, on average, 69 percent of the country's agricultural export potential has been realized through the study period. Measures to promote competitive exports along with pursuing free bilateral and regional trade agreements for removing border barriers are recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Analysis and ApplicationsSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207