MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036354136 · doi:10.36166/2531-4920-a008

Quando il saggio indica la luna lo stolto guarda il dito

2020· article· it· W3036354136 on OpenAlexaff
Mariaenrica Tinè, Kim Lokar Oliani, Martina Turrin, Marina Saetta, Manuel G. Cosio

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Padua Archive (University of Padua) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicineArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presentiamo il caso di un uomo affetto da dispnea ed ipossiemia persistenti, ma con esame obiettivo, volumi polmonari e radiografia del torace nella norma. Anamnesi patologica remota sostanzialmente muta. Questa presentazione deve far pensare all’ipertensione polmonare idiopatica, una patologia relativamente rara che deve essere sospettata nei pazienti che lamentano dispnea da sforzo, ipossiemia, dolore toracico oppressivo o tosse persistente, in presenza di un quadro funzionale e radiologico essenzialmente negativo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Padua Archive (University of Padua)Same topicMedical Imaging and Pathology StudiesFrench-language works237,207