MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036393229 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2019.0062

The Plot Thickens: Illustrated Victorian Serial Fiction from Dickens to Du Maurier by Mary Elizabeth Leighton and Lisa Surridge

2019· article· en· W3036393229 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lorraine Janzen Kooistra

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlot (graphics)Victorian literatureHistoryLiteratureVictorian eraReading (process)Art historyNothingArgument (complex analysis)ArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Plot Thickens: Illustrated Victorian Serial Fiction from Dickens to Du Maurier by Mary Elizabeth Leighton and Lisa Surridge Lorraine Janzen Kooistra FRSC (bio) The Plot Thickens: Illustrated Victorian Serial Fiction from Dickens to Du Maurier by Mary Elizabeth Leighton and Lisa Surridge;pp. 331, illustrated. Ohio UP, 2019. $95.99 cloth. This is a book about collaboration. Examining illustrated serial fiction from the 1830s to the 1890s, the authors analyze a plethora of collaborations— between pictures, words, and technologies; between artists, authors, and publishers; and between readers, formats, and temporalities— demonstrating how they contributed to Victorian practices of meaning-making. How fitting, then, that this gorgeously illustrated book makes its argument through its own visual-verbal format and productive collaborative authorship. Co-written by Mary Elizabeth Leighton and Lisa Surridge, The Plot Thickens: Illustrated Victorian Serial Fiction from Dickens to Du Maurier is a scholarly tour de force, showing what can be learned about the complex interrelationships between Victorian modes of production and consumption when we put down our classic paperback editions and turn to the archive. Using a materialist, historical method founded on considerations of form, Leighton and Surridge set out to bridge the gap between Victorian and modern readers by returning to original publication formats and reconstructing the complex reading practices they required. Their achievement is nothing short of groundbreaking. As the wide range of examples in The Plot Thickens demonstrates, taking account of serial illustration demands rethinking what we thought we knew about Victorian fiction and its readers. This study shows that illustrated serial formats must be understood as more than simple preludes to the volume editions we read today and retrospectively valorize as “the Victorian novel.” Arguing “that form is meaning,” Leighton and Surridge ask what narratological functions images played in the quintessentially Victorian form of the illustrated serial. As they have argued elsewhere, the plot of illustrated serial fiction is thickened by the presence of pictures. The interplay of verbal and visual narrative elements over time required nineteenth-century readers to move forward and backward in order to revisit key scenes and compare pictorial and textual information at various points in the plot. Moreover, readers often received visual information before they read the text itself, as full-page images on wrappers, frontispieces to parts, and pictorial initial letters were typically viewed first. Readers were thus invited to see illustration as an aid to interpreting characters, scenes, and plot events before, during, and after the reading process. These recursive practices compelled reflective reading strategies and developed advanced visual literacy in Victorian readers. While Leighton and Surridge infer Victorian reading practices principally from material formats, their reconstructions are persuasively rooted in physical evidence and demonstration. Moreover, they bolster their inferences with archival evidence from actual nineteenth-century readers, whose records of reading [End Page 325] illustrated serial fiction provide apt and illuminating models for their own method. The Plot Thickens is structured thematically rather than chronologically, in five thick chapters rich in historical detail and insightful analysis, each one addressing a different critical and theoretical question about the relationship between form and meaning in a particular subgenre. The first chapter, “Imagining the Self: Illustration and the Technology of Selfhood in David Copperfield and Cousin Phillis,” examines the roles illustration played in autobiographical serial fiction. Format is crucial here. Charles Dickens’s autobiographical novel of 1849–50 was issued in monthly parts illustrated by Hablôt K. Browne, with a wrapper and two full-page steel etchings at the beginning of each number. Leighton and Surridge skilfully read David’s retrospective autobiography against the emergence of illustrated mass print culture, showing how the past is represented as a series of recursively viewed visual tableaux, which require reviewing, revisioning, and reinterpreting over time as the narrator and his memories mature. In contrast, Elizabeth Gaskell’s novella, serialized in the Cornhill Magazine from November 1863 to February 1864, had only a single illustration by George Du Maurier in the first instalment. Significantly, this allowed the image to face the letterpress it pictured, a rare occurrence in illustrated serial fiction. Leighton and Surridge show that this single illustration acts as a narrative fulcrum, picturing the moment in...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian reviewSame topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207