MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036428437 · doi:10.1002/cctc.202000658

Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile‐Derived Co or Fe Containing Nanofibre Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction at the Alkaline Membrane Fuel Cell Cathode

2020· article· en· W3036428437 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemCatChem · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundInstitut Universitaire de FranceEesti Teadusagentuur
KeywordsPolyacrylonitrileCatalysisCathodeIonic liquidAlkaline fuel cellMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryCarbon fibersPyrolysisProton exchange membrane fuel cellMembraneChemical engineeringIon exchangeChemistryIonComposite materialOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Electrospun polyacrylonitrile (PAN) based carbon nanofibres (CNF) are employed as cathode catalysts in anion‐exchange membrane fuel cell (AEMFC) for the first time. The catalysts are prepared via pyrolysis of Co or Fe salt‐containing PAN fibre with and without the ionic liquid (IL) additive. The catalyst material preparation is optimised by assessing the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity of different transition metal and nitrogen‐doped CNFs in 0.1 M KOH by rotating disc electrode method followed by testing in real AEMFC configuration. The best performance in the AEMFC is observed in case of Fe and IL containing PAN fibre that was pyrolysed at 1000 °C and additionally treated in an acid solution (Fe/IL‐PAN‐A1000). In the AEMFC, the Fe/IL‐PAN‐A1000 catalyst showed the maximum power density ( P max ) of 289 mW cm −2 , which is 82 % of the P max obtained with commercial Pt/C cathode catalyst (352 mW cm −2 ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.876

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it