MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036470112 · doi:10.3233/shti200283

Intelligent Tools for Precision Public Health

2020· article· en· W3036470112 on OpenAlexaff
Anya Okhmatovskaia, David L. Buckeridge

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in health technology and informatics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOntologyTransferabilityPublic health interventionsPsychological interventionComputer sciencePublic healthSet (abstract data type)PopulationSoftwareData scienceKnowledge managementMedicineMachine learningEnvironmental healthNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The idea of "precision public health" (PPH) was proposed as an alternative to a one-size-fits-all approach to improving population health, which is not always effective. PPH aims to develop and apply interventions in a customized way, taking into account the detailed information about the target group. To enable the implementation of PPH in practice, we are developing an ontology-driven software platform that provides: a) access to detailed up-to-date information about population health, b) a structured machine-readable repository of evidence about public health interventions, and c) a set of intelligent tools to facilitate the assessment of evidence transferability, i.e. to determine how well certain interventions fit a given population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.182
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in health technology and informaticsSame topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207