MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036472213 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.12929

Approximation algorithms for general cluster routing problem

2020· preprint· en· W3036472213 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoyan Zhang, Donglei Du, Gregory Gutin, Qiaoxia Ming, Jian Sun

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVertex (graph theory)Triangle inequalityCombinatoricsApproximation algorithmUndirected graphGraphRouting (electronic design automation)MathematicsWeight functionCluster (spacecraft)Graph algorithmsComputer scienceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDiscrete mathematicsAlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Graph routing problems have been investigated extensively in operations research, computer science and engineering due to their ubiquity and vast applications. In this paper, we study constant approximation algorithms for some variations of the general cluster routing problem. In this problem, we are given an edge-weighted complete undirected graph $G=(V,E,c),$ whose vertex set is partitioned into clusters $C_{1},\dots ,C_{k}.$ We are also given a subset $V'$ of $V$ and a subset $E'$ of $E.$ The weight function $c$ satisfies the triangle inequality. The goal is to find a minimum cost walk $T$ that visits each vertex in $V'$ only once, traverses every edge in $E'$ at least once and for every $i\in [k]$ all vertices of $C_i$ are traversed consecutively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.123 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Graph Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207