MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036489970 · doi:10.1177/0954406220934831

Large-scale motion of submerged offset jets issuing from sharp-edged rectangular nozzles

2020· article· en· W3036489970 on OpenAlexaff
Baafour Nyantekyi-Kwakye

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleTurbulenceVortexMechanicsReynolds numberJet (fluid)PhysicsTurbulence kinetic energyEntrainment (biomusicology)Offset (computer science)Doppler effectReynolds stressAcousticsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mean flow, turbulence characteristics, and dynamics of large-scale vortices are investigated for an offset jet issuing from different nozzle expansion ratios using a four-receiver acoustic Doppler velocimeter. The jet was discharged from sharp-edged rectangular nozzles with expansion ratios of 0.24, 0.49, 0.75, and 1.00 at Reynolds number of 5.3 × 10 4 . The decay rate of the maximum mean velocity decreased with increasing expansion ratio due to suppressed lateral entrainment of ambient fluid. The acoustic Doppler velocimeter proved capable of providing high-quality data to investigate the energy spectrum and turbulent structures embedded in the flow. Large-scale vortices dominated the recirculation region compared to the reattachment and developing regions of the jet. Increasing the expansion ratio resulted in larger order of magnitude of the vortices within the recirculation region. The turbulent structures stretched in the lateral direction in regions where smaller-sized structures existed in the streamwise direction and vice versa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering ScienceSame topicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet FlowsFrench-language works237,207