MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Correspondence and Unpublished Papers of Robert Persons, SJ, ed. Victor Houliston, Ginevra Crosignani, and Thomas M. McCoog, SJ (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2017).

2020· book-chapter· en· W3036493063 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jan Machielsen

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWelshGentryContext (archaeology)ClassicsHistoryPerformance artHumanitiesArtArt historyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter examines the volume on the letters and papers of the English Jesuit Robert Persons (1546–1610) — the most prominent of the leaders of the early English Mission — edited by Victor Houliston, Ginevra Crosignani, and Thomas M. McCoog, SJ. This volume covers the period in Persons's life from shortly after his expulsion from Balliol College in 1574 to the run up of the Spanish Armada in 1588. The letters in between give a first-hand account of a wide range of crucial events. They cover the conflicts between the Welsh and the English at the Venerable English College in Rome. They also give more than a glimpse into the fateful mission of Persons and Edmund Campion to England in 1580–1581. Letters usefully place this endeavour within the context of global Jesuit missions. The documents show the elitism of the Jesuits, preoccupied above all with the conversion of the gentry. The chapter then considers a number of considerable challenges faced by the editors in putting this correspondence together.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0900.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooks→Same topicReformation and Early Modern Christianity→French-language works237,207→