MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3036494552 · doi:10.14288/1.0389546

Detecting the phenology of important vegetative grizzly bear foods using remote sensing and analysing their relationship to grizzly bear habitat selection

2020· article· en· W3036494552 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cameron J. R. McClelland

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrizzly BearsHabitatGeographyPhenologySelection (genetic algorithm)EcologyRemote sensingBiologyPopulationDemographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding patterns in vegetation phenology under increasing anthropogenic pressures, and within a changing climate, is essential for determining the availability of key plant-food resources, which drive habitat selection of wildlife. In creating a fine scale phenology product to monitor daily phenology trends, this thesis determines how variations in availability of key plant-food species is affecting daily habitat selection of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos), across years, within the Yellowhead Bear Management Area, Alberta, Canada. Dynamic Time Warping is used to combine Landsat satellite data and Moderate Resolution Image Spectroradiometer (MODIS) imagery, to quantify daily changes in vegetation at a 30 m resolution, from 2000-2018. This approach, entitled DRIVE, was validated against the start and end of season dates (SOS and EOS respectively) derived from time-lapse imagery obtained from ground cameras. Results showed correlations of r = 0.73 at SOS and r = 0.85 at EOS with a mean absolute error of 7.17 and 10.76 days at SOS and EOS respectively. Analysis of the DRIVE product also indicated that SOS is advancing at a maximum rate of 0.78 days per year from 2000-2018. A set of new methods were then developed to create daily vegetative food species availability layers from 2000-2017. Annual species distribution models (SDMs) were created using maximum entropy modelling. SDMs were combined with DRIVE outputs to create daily plant-food availability layers for eight food species. Food availability layers were combined with environmental variables and grizzly bear GPS collar data to create resource selection functions modelling daily and seasonal selection. Results determined that in the dry spring, selection for roots was stronger and occurred earlier than in the average/wet years, in the wet summer the length of selection increased for forbs and in the dry fall, the period of selection for berries was longer than in the wet year. Through this research, I found that variations in phenology driven by climate and anthropogenic processes, has the potential to affect grizzly bear habitat selection into the future. The datasets and approaches developed here will provide resource managers with an important tool for use in grizzly bear habitat management and population recovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Same topicWildlife Ecology and Conservation→French-language works237,207→