MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036506990 · doi:10.7202/1067981ar

LA CHARTE QUÉBÉCOISE VUE SOUS L’ANGLE DU DROIT DU TRAVAIL

2020· article· fr· W3036506990 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Michel Coutu

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de droit international · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des ForêtsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alors que nous baignons dans une rhétorique néo-libérale depuis le début des années 80, il est frappant de relever à quel point le professeur Jacques-Yvan Morin met l’accent sur la pleine reconnaissance des droits économiques et sociaux comme précondition essentielle de l’épanouissement de la démocratie politique. L’étude qui suit examine l’impact de la Charte des droits et libertés de la personne sur le droit des rapports collectifs du travail, en partant de certains éléments de l’étude de Jacques-Yvan Morin : la genèse des droits fondamentaux de la personne, au regard de l’idée de droit naturel; la qualité de droit fondamental des libertés syndicales, y compris du droit de grève; enfin, la prépondérance de la Charte québécoise sur la législation ordinaire et sa protection contre la tyrannie de la majorité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.014
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de droit internationalSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207