Loss of genetic variation and sex determination system in North American northern pike characterized by whole-genome resequencing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The northern pike Esox lucius is a freshwater fish renowned for having low genetic diversity but ecological success throughout the Northern Hemisphere. Here we generate an annotated chromosome-level genome assembly of 941 Mbp in length with 25 chromosome-length scaffolds using long-reads and chromatin capture technology. We then align whole-genome resequencing data against this reference to genotype northern pike from Alaska through New Jersey (n = 47). A striking decrease in genetic diversity occurs along the sampling range, whereby samples to the west of the North American Continental Divide have substantially higher diversity than populations to the east. As an example, individuals from Interior Alaska in the west and St. Lawrence River in the east have on average 181K and 64K heterozygous SNPs per individual, respectively (i.e., a SNP variant every 3.2 kbp and 11.2 kbp, respectively). Even with such low diversity, individuals clustered with strong support within each population, and this may be related to numerous private alleles in each population. Evidence for recent population expansion was observed for a Manitoba hatchery and the St. Lawrence population (Tajima's D = -1.07 and -1.30, respectively). Non-uniform patterns of diversity were observed across the genome, with large regions showing elevated diversity in several chromosomes, including LG24. In populations with the master sex determining gene amhby still present in the genome, amhby is in LG24. As expected, amhby was largely male-specific in Alaska and the Yukon and absent southeast to these populations, but we also document some amhby(-) males in Alaska and amhby(+) males in the Columbia River. This indicates that rather than a discrete boundary after which amhby was lost in North America, there is a patchwork of presence of this system in the western region. These results support the theory that northern pike recolonized North America from refugia in Alaska and expanded following deglaciation from west to east, with probable founder effects resulting in loss of both neutral and functional diversity including the loss of the sex determination system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".