MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036679013 · doi:10.4000/ries.9391

L’avenir de l’école, mais dans quel monde ? Un point de vue nordaméricain

2020· article· fr· W3036679013 on OpenAlexaff
Claude Lessard

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale d éducation de Sèvres · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Practices and Policies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentrale des Syndicats du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partant des scénarios de l’école de demain définis par l’OCDE en 2001, cet article fait le point sur la situation actuelle de l’éducation en général, avant d’analyser des évolutions possibles dans trois dimensions de l’institution scolaire : la mission de l’école (et son curriculum), la gouvernance et la pédagogie. Celles-ci sont marquées par le passage d’un cadre de politiques publiques typique de l’État-providence à un autre cadre propre à une « marchandisation » et à une individualisation de la vie sociale. Face à un avenir incertain, parions sur une école qui, à l’ère de post-vérité, affirme sa mission cognitive et sociale, manifeste sa capacité historique d’adaptation et prend le risque d’une gestion plus décentralisée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale d éducation de SèvresSame topicEducational Practices and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207