MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036740076 · doi:10.1680/jenes.20.00019

Spatio-temporal variation of aerosols in ENSO events over Western India using satellite data

2020· article· en· W3036740076 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vikas Patel, Prakash A Taksal, Digambar S. Londhe, Yashwant B. Katpatal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerosolModerate-resolution imaging spectroradiometerEnvironmental scienceClimatologySatelliteSpectroradiometerSeasonalityAtmospheric sciencesSpatial variabilityEl Niño Southern OscillationSpring (device)Atmosphere (unit)Variation (astronomy)MeteorologyGeographyGeologyReflectivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spatial variation of the average aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 555 nm obtained from the multi-angle imaging spectroradiometer satellite sensor over India for 2000–2016 illustrates that Western India shows a relatively lower aerosol loading compared with the northern and eastern parts of India. Among the seasonal variations of the average AOD, spring shows a higher aerosol loading, particularly over Jodhpur (0.518) and Kota (0.518), and fall shows the least. In spring, these variations may be due to the meteorological conditions that bring a large quantity of dust and other types of aerosols in the atmosphere of Western India. Temporal variation of AOD indicates that in 2006, abrupt change in AOD (<0.2) was observed over all the cities. Among all cities, Mumbai shows strong increasing trends during 2000–2016 with a Sen’s slope of 0.009. Overall, the study concludes that compared with La Niña years, El Niño years correspond to a higher aerosol loading over Western India, primarily over Surat (0.357), Mumbai (0.349) and Jodhpur (0.334).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsFrench-language works237,207