STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF A TERM PROJECT WITH RESPECT TO TECHNICAL CONCEPTS UNDERSTANDING, CREATIVE THINKING AND INTEREST IN PROGRAMMING IN A LARGE, FLIPPED DELIVERY INTRODUCTORY PROGRAMMING COURSE – A CASE STUDY
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Computing for Engineers (ENGG 233), first year programming class uses a 3-week end term project to involve students in a technical, creative and applicable project. In Fall 2018, students designed and programmed a new digital dashboard, displaying information such as current speed and fuel level based on sensory inputs such as engine revolutions per minute, gear ratio, and car position in the horizontal and vertical axis. A student perception survey was distributed and analyzed to better understand the view that students have towards term projects. The results from a Kendall Tau-B test are presented in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it