MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036747346 · doi:10.7202/1069474ar

Les sites Internet de compositeur·rices, ou la permanence des modèles d’écriture de soi

2020· article· fr· W3036747346 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Irina Kirchberg, Federico Lazzaro

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue musicale OICRM · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En tant que production non musicale destinée à la lecture, le site Internet personnel d’un·e compositeur·rice peut être considéré, dans son ensemble, comme un « écrit » de compositeur en plus de servir d’archive pour différentes formes d’écrits par ou sur l’artiste (textes de présentation d’oeuvres, interviews, etc.). Les analyses comparées d’un type de texte omniprésent sur les sites de compositeur·rices – la biographie – ainsi que de l’approche au genre du texte de présentation d’une oeuvre permettent de considérer les stratégies d’autoprésentation et de présentation de leur musique mises en oeuvre par les compositeur·rices. Ces analyses aboutissent au constat d’une tendance générale à la production de contenus plutôt destinés aux professionnels de la musique et à la sous-exploitation des possibilités offertes par le numérique pour la promotion et la médiation de la musique contemporaine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.324
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.011 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue musicale OICRMSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207