Le Québec et les programmes d'accès à l'égalité : un rendez-vous manqué?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Toute reproduction en tout ou en partie est interdite sans autorisation des auteurs.6 Il est pertinent de noter que l'ensemble des personnes noires sont regroupées dans un seul sous-groupe, alors que les personnes asiatiques sont divisées en plusieurs sous-groupes. Encadré 1 Définition de minorités visiblesLa définition provient de la Loi sur l'équité en matière d'emploi (1995) du Canada et désigne les « personnes, autres que les Autochtones, qui ne sont pas de race blanche ou qui n'ont pas la peau blanche ».De manière plus précise, la population des minorités visibles est constituée de 12 sousgroupes : 1-les Chinois; 2-les Sud-Asiatiques; 3-les Noirs 6 ; 4-les Philippins; 5-les Latino-Américains; 6-les Asiatiques du Sud-est; 7-les Arabes; 8-les Asiatiques occidentaux; 9-les Japonais; 10-les Coréens; 11-les autres minorités visibles; et 12-les minorités visibles multiples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".