Modeling of High Voltage Pollution Discharge to Investigate Hot Stick Flashover
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electric “flashover” or insulation breakdown has occurred on “hot stick” safety tools used on live AC transmission lines at Manitoba Hydro in 1997 and 2002. Investigations showed pollution flashover as the cause, whereby leakage currents cascade into flashover. Prior to reinstating live-line work with mitigation procedures, DC voltage experiments suggested an atypical flashover uncharacteristic of pollution flashover without leakage currents, which may require a different mitigation strategy. In this thesis, statistical analysis shows that relative humidity has a greater correlation than voltage with the type of flashover. Labeled a “fast flashover”, it seems to be distinct from pollution flashover, although not statistically significant. A time-stepping computer model was developed to calculate a critical voltage for flashover as a function of relative humidity. However, lack of data prevents the model from making firm conclusions. A list of recommended research is proposed to remedy these deficiencies to allow future model refinement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".