Design and Characteristics of Axial Magnetic Gear Using Rectangular Magnet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This experimental study examines the characteristics and performance of axial magnetic gear by using a variation of the rectangular neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnetic layer which is assembled on an acrylic disc.The aim is to reduce magnetic reluctance which can increase torque and facilitate the manufacture of magnetic gear.In addition, it can reduce the use of NdFeB permanent magnets instead of sectoral magnets.An appropriate method for predicting the transmitted torque produced by axial magnetic gears with four rectangular magnetic layers is demonstrated using the output power approach.The results show that the performance of axial magnetic-gear with 4 layers tends to be similar to the performance of a direct drive.Tests on the 2400 rpm rotation with the loading of 200, 300 and 400 ohms respectively showed a maximum torque of 2.24 (Nm) 10 -3 , 1.56 (Nm) 10 -3 , and 1.1 (Nm).The results of this paper appear to be useful for the development of axial magnetic-gear industrial applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".