MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036887016 · doi:10.24908/pceea.vi0.14171

A SHORT ONLINE COURSE TARGETING PROFESSIONALISM, THE IMPACT OF ENGINEERING ON SOCIETY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, AND ETHICS AND EQUITY

2020· article· en· W3036887016 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Nasim Razavinia, Laurent Mydlarski

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Education and Curriculum Development
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquity (law)Engineering ethicsCurriculumRelevance (law)Online courseMedical educationEngineering managementEngineeringPsychologyPolitical sciencePedagogyMathematics educationMedicineLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the role and responsibilities of Professional Engineers is of immediate relevance to those who aspire to enter the profession. These obligations most prominently manifest themselves in three of the twelve graduate attributes: Professionalism; the Impact of engineering on society and the environment; and Ethics and equity. Following an analysis of the curriculum map of programs that was performed as part of the CEAB-mandated Continual Improvement process at McGill University, it was concluded that our students could benefit from additional training in the aforementioned three graduate attributes. To this end, a required, 0-credit, online course was created to further expose and train Engineering students in all programs on these three important topics. The present paper will i) review the motivation behind the creation of this new course, ii) describe the evolution of its format and design, and iii) discuss the course’s contents and implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicEngineering Education and Curriculum DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207