MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036940164

Fundamental Impact Tests On Mortar Specimens For Failure Patterns of Foundation Piles Due to Up-Down Vibration In Earthquakes

2007· article· en· W3036940164 on OpenAlex
Tomio TAMANO, Masanobu KANAOKA, Bimal Shrestha

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Seventeenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Canadian institutionsLife Prediction Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMortarGeotechnical engineeringShearing (physics)Ultimate tensile strengthStructural engineeringFoundation (evidence)Tension (geology)VibrationGeologyMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents experimental investigations on particular failure patterns of foundation piles found in Hyogoken-Nambu Earthquake (1995) that were probably induced by seismic up-down vibrations. Impact tests on cylindrical mortar specimens were conducted in different loading modes. Vertical splitting failure was observed in static compression tests whereas horizontal tensile failure occurred in static tension tests and impact tension tests. Depending on the level of impact power, failure patterns in impact compression tests were found varying from cone splitting failure to Xshape shearing failure, 45-degree shearing failure, and horizontal tensile failure due to reflection of stress wave.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it