MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036940164

Fundamental Impact Tests On Mortar Specimens For Failure Patterns of Foundation Piles Due to Up-Down Vibration In Earthquakes

2007· article· en· W3036940164 on OpenAlexaff
Tomio TAMANO, Masanobu KANAOKA, Bimal Shrestha

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Seventeenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Canadian institutionsLife Prediction Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMortarGeotechnical engineeringShearing (physics)Ultimate tensile strengthStructural engineeringFoundation (evidence)Tension (geology)VibrationGeologyMaterials scienceEngineeringComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents experimental investigations on particular failure patterns of foundation piles found in Hyogoken-Nambu Earthquake (1995) that were probably induced by seismic up-down vibrations. Impact tests on cylindrical mortar specimens were conducted in different loading modes. Vertical splitting failure was observed in static compression tests whereas horizontal tensile failure occurred in static tension tests and impact tension tests. Depending on the level of impact power, failure patterns in impact compression tests were found varying from cone splitting failure to Xshape shearing failure, 45-degree shearing failure, and horizontal tensile failure due to reflection of stress wave.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Seventeenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering ConferenceSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationFrench-language works237,207