Acquired Epidermodysplasia Verruciformis in the Setting of Renal Transplant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Epidermodysplasia verruciformis (EV) is a rare dermatologic condition that is clinically characterized by flat, cutaneous, verrucous papules, pityriasis versicolor-like lesions, and similar lichenoid papules. There are 2 forms of EV: a classic inherited genodermatosis and a secondary acquired form. EV predisposes individuals to infections with certain types of human papillomavirus virus and subsequently increases the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. The acquired form occurs in immunosuppressed patients, particularly in patients infected with HIV; however, it has also been described in patients who have undergone stem cell and solid organ transplantation. We report an additional case of renal transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy-associated acquired EV (AEV) in a 78-year-old man with multiple flesh-colored to violaceous, flat-topped papules distributed on the face and trunk clinically mimicking lichen planus. Biopsy was typical for that of EV, demonstrating enlarged keratinocytes with a blue-gray cytoplasm, a thickened granular layer, acanthosis, and hyperkeratosis. Herein, we discuss an unusual presentation of an AEV-mimicking lichen planus with review of the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".