Acute orofacial pain leads to prolonged changes in behavioral and affective pain components
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute pain that persists for a few days is associated with a reduction in patients' quality of life. Orofacial persistent pain promotes psychological disorders such as anxiety, impairs daily essential activities such as eating, and results in decreased social interaction. Here, we investigated whether rats subjected to orofacial formalin injection or intraoral incision surgery display persistent facial heat hyperalgesia, ongoing pain, anxiety-like behavior, and changes in ultrasonic vocalization. Orofacial formalin injection or intraoral incision caused facial heat hyperalgesia for 3 days compared with saline-injected and sham animals. In addition, both experimental groups showed a reduction in the number of entries and in the time spent in the open arms in the elevated plus maze test on day 3, suggesting that anxiety-like behavior developed as a consequence of persistent pain. At this time point, both groups also displayed a reduction in the number of 50-kHz calls, specifically in the flat subtype, which suggests a decrease in social communication. Moreover, on day 3 after surgery, systemic morphine produced robust conditioned place preference in rats subjected to intraoral incision compared with sham, and the former group also presented increased spontaneous facial grooming, revealing the presence of ongoing pain. Finally, Western blot and immunohistochemistry analysis showed a reduction in tyrosine hydroxylase expression in the nucleus accumbens, which may reflect a decrease in mesolimbic dopaminergic activity. Altogether, the results demonstrate that acute orofacial pain causes prolonged changes in behavioral and affective pain components, which may be related to dopaminergic changes in the nucleus accumbens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".