MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036986041 · doi:10.3138/ctr.183.019

A “Shimmering Map” of Theatre and (Im)migration in Canada

2020· article· en· W3036986041 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Brian Batchelor

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismIdeologyPolitical theatreTheatre studiesPerspective (graphical)Theatre directorPostmodern theatreColonialismArtSociologyMedia studiesGender studiesVisual artsHistoryPolitical sciencePoliticsLiteratureArchaeologyPostmodernismLawPedagogyDrama

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theatre and (Im)Migration, edited by Yana Meerzon, is a collected volume that investigates ongoing projects of Canadian multicultural ideology and Canadian theatre nationalisms from the perspective of (im)migrant artists and companies. This review outlines the contributions in this book as they situate Canadian theatre within ongoing legacies of settler colonialism, examine (im)migrant theatre in relation to community and nation formation, closely read (im)migrant theatre and performance works, explore applied and practice-based methodologies, discuss the rehearsal and development practices of (im)migrant theatre artists and companies, and investigate performances from within neo-liberal experience economies. The volume operates as a “shimmering map” (Meerzon 5) that reflects the routes and roots of (im)migrant theatre in the country that we now call Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.013
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207