MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3036989968 · doi:10.7202/1067976ar

LE DROIT À L’ÉGALITÉ : PIERRE ANGULAIRE DE LA CHARTE QUÉBÉCOISE ?

2020· article· fr· W3036989968 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Daniel Proulx

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de droit international · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Social Philosophy
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)Université de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Après avoir rappelé les fondements philosophiques et juridiques du droit à l’égalité et l’évolution prodigieuse qu’il a connu au cours des derniers siècles, l’auteur montre que la Charte québécoise tant souhaitée par Jacques-Yvan Morin s’inscrit dans ce mouvement historique. Il est clair que ce droit fondamental en démocratie, véritable pierre angulaire de la Charte québécoise, ne se réduit plus à l’idée d’égalité formelle. Malheureusement, c’est le constat de l’auteur, les tribunaux supérieurs, à commencer par la Cour d’appel, ne semblent pas en phase avec l’évolution qu’a connue le droit à l’égalité, ce qui en réduit considérablement la portée et les promesses au Québec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de droit internationalSame topicLegal and Social PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207