MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037019054 · doi:10.1109/tcpmt.2020.3004414

A Temperature and Dielectric Roughness-Aware Matrix Rational Approximation Model for the Reliability Assessment of Copper– Graphene Hybrid On-Chip Interconnects

2020· article· en· W3037019054 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing Technology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersScience and Engineering Research Board
KeywordsInterconnectionReliability (semiconductor)SpiceElectronic engineeringParametric statisticsDielectricMaterials scienceSignal integrityComputer scienceOptoelectronicsMathematicsEngineeringPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a closed-form matrix rational approximation (MRA) model is presented for the reliability assessment of copper-graphene hybrid on-chip interconnect networks. The key feature of this MRA model is its capacity to predict how the different values of temperature and dielectric roughness affect the signal integrity performance of the hybrid interconnect networks. As a result, the proposed MRA model is well suited for very fast parametric sweeps and worst case analysis of the hybrid interconnect networks, which has not been possible using existing closed-form models or even SPICE simulations. Numerical examples show that the proposed model is significantly more efficient than conventional models while exhibiting error less than 5%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.784

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it