MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037042075 · doi:10.1109/jstqe.2020.3002758

Thermally-Reconfigurable Silicon Photonic Devices and Circuits

2020· article· en· W3037042075 on OpenAlexaff
Yiwei Xie, Yaocheng Shi, Liu Liu, Jianwei Wang, Rubana Bahar Priti, Guowu Zhang, Odile Liboiron-Ladouceur, Daoxin Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Science Fund for Distinguished Young ScholarsNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhotonicsSilicon photonicsReconfigurabilityPhotonic integrated circuitMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsElectronic circuitHybrid silicon laserSiliconResonatorComputer scienceElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reconfigurable photonic integrated devices and circuits are very important for many applications. Among various mechanisms for realizing reconfigurability, thermo-optic effect is popular because of the availability for many materials, the design simplicity and the fabrication ease. In particular, silicon has a large thermo-optic coefficient as well as a high heat conductivity, and thus it is promising to realize efficient thermally-reconfigurable silicon photonic integrated devices and circuits. Recent progress is reviewed in this paper. First, thermally-tunable silicon photonic filters based on different structures are summarized, including microring resonators (MRRs) and MRRs-assisted Mach-Zehnder interferometers (MZIs). Second, silicon photonic switches based on MZIs and MRRs are reviewed. Finally, a review is given for thermally-reconfigurable silicon photonic integrated circuits developed for the applications in quantum photonics, microwave photonics, and optical interconnects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum ElectronicsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207