Pitch–Heave Symmetric Stall Flutter of a NACA0012 at Transitional Reynolds Numbers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Large-amplitude limit cycle oscillations (LCOs) in one degree of freedom (1DOF) in pitch and 2DOFs in pitch–heave induced by stall flutter are explored experimentally on a NACA0012 wing. Because stall flutter is mainly understood from the point of view of dynamic stall, it has been generally agreed that the oscillations associated with negative aerodynamic damping occur about a large angle of attack. In contrast, symmetric oscillations about the origin are reported in this work, where the amplitude of oscillation, ranging from 30° to about 50°, is limited by flow separation. The elastic axis is fixed at . The airspeed is varied over a range of Reynolds numbers extending from to . For experiments in 2DOFs, the stiffness in pitch is kept constant, whereas the heave stiffness is changed to cover a range of frequency ratios, . Except for cases with frequency ratios close to one, the introduction of the DOF in heave does not significantly affect the LCO dynamics. It is determined that the stall flutter observed is fundamentally a 1DOF problem in pitch, whereby the pitch motion drives the heave motion. Nonetheless, the work done by the lift force (on the heave) is larger than the work done by the aerodynamic moment (on the pitch).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it