A numerical investigation of friction stir welding parameters in joining dissimilar aluminium alloys using finite element method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Friction stir welding is a relatively new solid-state welding process which has several superiorities over generic welding methods. In this study, aluminium alloys (AA5083-O and AA6061-T6) are selected to investigate effects of three welding variables namely tool rotation speed, tool traverse speed, and tool diameter on temperature distribution, weld width, weld depth, and heat affected zone width using finite element method. The Johnson-Cook plasticity model is implemented into Abaqus software to simulate the material plastic deformation occurring during welding process. The results demonstrated that increasing rotational speed and tool diameter lead in an increase in material temperature. Increasing traverse speed resulted in lower temperature distribution. Temperature distribution, as well as the size and shape of welding areas, are also different due to different mechanical and thermal properties. The wider heat affected zone predicted for the AA6061-T6 can be explained by its higher thermal conductivity and lower specific heat. [Submitted 16 October 2018; Accepted 25 May 2019]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it