Parameter tuning of the HCSCROCFO-3Opt algorithm for solving the capacitated vehicle routing problem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes the cuckoo search (CS), central force optimization (CFO), chemical reaction optimization (CRO) and 3-Opt for solving the capacitated vehicle routing problem (CVRP).HCSCROCFO-3Opt, which is the parallel hybrid algorithm that is proposed, is a form of augmented HCSCROCFO with a local search process founded on CS that utilizes positive aspects of the other optimization approaches including CRO and CFO in order to enhance quality of initial population and improve local search, correspondingly.The work is motivated by the need to enhance the computational effectiveness through attainment of improved outcomes compared to previous popular solutions, to explore the features of different parameters of to seek some ideal solutions.The first stage entails solving of CVRP through setting a variety of values to tune parameters for the HCSCROCFO-3Opt proposed.Then initialization of algorithm CS, CRO, CFO parameters are accomplished through tuning parameters within a tuning cycle.Subsequently, a novel solution is swapped in a random manner through a levy flight within the central loop, followed by execution of the hybrid solution as well as new CRO, CFO and CS algorithm solutions, whose implementation is supposed to enhance results for the local 3-Opt.Ultimately, the most ideal solution for general hybrid model's solution space is identified, after which the solution that is best-suited for the CVRP purposes is presented.Within the standard CVRP cases, reported computational tests in large scale in the literature demonstrate the efficiency of presented approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".