MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Subjective Assessment of Stereoscopic Image Quality: The Impact of Visually Lossless Compression

2020· article· en· W3037153937 on OpenAlexaff
Sanjida Sharmin Mohona, Domenic Au, Onoise G. Kio, Richard Robinson, Yuqian Hou, Laurie M. Wilcox, Robert S. Allison

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStereoscopyCodecComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceImage compressionData compressionLossless compressionImage qualityFlickerComputer graphics (images)Image processingImage (mathematics)Computer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In stereoscopic displays different images are presented separately to the left and right eyes. This requirement may increase the bandwidth demand as well as increase the occurrence of visible compression-related artefacts. Here we report the results of a large-scale subjective assessment of high dynamic range (HDR) stereoscopic image compression. The ISO/IEC 29170-2 flicker paradigm was adapted for stereoscopic images and used to evaluate two VESA (Video Electronics Standards Association) image compression codecs: DSC 1.2a and VDCM 1.2.2. We compared the performance on stereoscopic images versus 2D images for both codecs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207