MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Accurate Light Load Loss Analysis of Hybrid Modulation Strategy for ZVS Operation of Low-Q LLC Resonant Converter for Wide Input Voltage Range Applications

2020· article· en· W3037230774 on OpenAlexaff
A. K. Awasthi, Snehal Bagawade, Praveen Jain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuty cycleTransformerResonant inverterCapacitanceElectrical engineeringDiodeTopology (electrical circuits)Resonant converterCapacitorParasitic capacitanceVoltageComputer scienceElectronic engineeringPhysicsInverterEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Light load efficiency and output regulation of LLC resonant converter is a critical problem for wide input voltage and load range applications due to converter's parasitic capacitances such as rectifier diode junction capacitance (C <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">j</sub> ). Compact size, high density and high transformer turns-ratio requirements for micro-inverter applications adds significant distributed capacitance (C <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">d</sub> ) of low-profile transformer, worsening output regulation and zero- voltage switching (ZVS) capability at light loads. Magnetic core losses and turn-off switching losses in power MOSFETs further degrade power conversion efficiency at light loads. Therefore, an improved loss analysis for a hybrid modulation technique is proposed for full-bridge LLC resonant converter. The proposed methodology calculates duty cycle offline such that minimum power losses are incurred at different light loading condition. Variation in switching frequency at selected duty cycle value regulates output voltage. Time domain analysis of proposed technique including effects of C <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">d</sub> and C <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">j</sub> is performed to ensure accurate loss calculation. An experimental prototype for 20-40V input, 380V/300W output LLC converter is tested for validation of theoretical analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207