MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3037358903 · doi:10.1089/jamp.2020.1622

Urgent Appeal from International Society for Aerosols in Medicine (ISAM) During COVID-19: Clinical Decision Makers and Governmental Agencies Should Consider the Inhaled Route of Administration: A Statement from the ISAM Regulatory and Standardization Issues Networking Group

2020· article· en· W3037358903 on OpenAlexaff
Jolyon P. Mitchell, Ariel Berlinski, Sebastian Canisius, David Cipolla, Myrna Dolovich, Igor Gonda, Günther Hochhaus, Nani Kadrichu, Svetlana Lyapustina, Heidi M. Mansour, Chantal Darquenne, Michael T. Newhouse, Stéphan Ehrmann, Robert G. Humphries, Homer A. Boushey

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceAppealPolitical scienceManagementLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug DeliveryVol. 33, No. 4 Letters to the EditorFree AccessUrgent Appeal from International Society for Aerosols in Medicine (ISAM) During COVID-19: Clinical Decision Makers and Governmental Agencies Should Consider the Inhaled Route of Administration: A Statement from the ISAM Regulatory and Standardization Issues Networking GroupJolyon P. Mitchell, Ariel Berlinski, Sebastian Canisius, David Cipolla, Myrna B. Dolovich, Igor Gonda, Guenther Hochhaus, Nani Kadrichu, Svetlana Lyapustina, Heidi M. Mansour, Chantal Darquenne, Andy R. Clark, Michael Newhouse, Stephan Ehrmann, Robert Humphries, and Homer BousheyJolyon P. MitchellAddress correspondence to: Jolyon P. Mitchell, PhD, Jolyon Mitchell Inhaler Consultancy Services, Inc., 1154 St. Anthony Road, London N6H 2R1, Ontario, Canada E-mail Address: [email protected]Jolyon Mitchell Inhaler Consultancy Services, Inc., London, Ontario, Canada.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, Ariel BerlinskiPulmonology Division, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, Sebastian CanisiusACLiRA Consulting GmbH, Ebsdorfergrund, Germany.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, David CipollaInsmed, Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, Myrna B. DolovichDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, Igor GondaRespidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts, USA.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, Guenther HochhausCollege of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, Nani KadrichuInspired—Pulmonary Solutions LLC, San Carlos, California, USA.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, Svetlana LyapustinaFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, Heidi M. MansourCollege of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and The University of Arizona-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, USA.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, Chantal DarquenneDepartment of Medicine, UCSD, La Jolla, California, USA.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, Andy R. ClarkAerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California, USA.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, Michael NewhouseSt. Joseph's Hospital Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, Stephan EhrmannCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Tours, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Tours, France.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, Robert HumphriesVisionRealisation, Shepshed, Leicestershire, United Kingdom. *Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this author, and Homer BousheySchool of Medicine, Universtiy of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.*Member of ISAM.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:27 Jul 2020https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2020.1622AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookXLinked InRedditEmail The present COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in massive disruption to the normal operation of societies worldwide. There is currently the prospect of a lengthy period of continued disease outbreak, associated with both serious morbidity and mortality, as well as the significant potential for further waves of infection as regulations regarding population mobility are relaxed. So far, the emphasis for pharmacological/biological agent-based therapies has been focused on agents that are administered by traditional routes, in particular injection. Yet, the location of initial infection (i.e., upper respiratory tract and central airways through direct surface contact or deposition of inhaled droplets) and the route of disease progression after initial infection are primarily through the respiratory system. Furthermore, the morbidity and mortality outcomes are manifested primarily in the respiratory tract, unless and until multiple organ failure occurs.Members of International Society for Aerosols in Medicine (ISAM), therefore, believe that there is an urgent need to accelerate the development of inhaled therapies for COVID-19.There are many examples of approved inhaled therapies for respiratory diseases, including for both viral and bacterial infections, for example, the use of inhaled ribavarin for respiratory syncytial virus infection(1,2) and inhaled zanamivir for influenza infection,(3) as well as the treatment of chronic conditions, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and cystic fibrosis.(4,5) Furthermore, the use of inhaled measles vaccine in Mexico is an example of a preventative noninjectable strategy that is safe and efficacious.(6) These inhaled therapies have proven to be both efficacious and safe by achieving high local concentrations at the sites of action in the lungs, while minimizing systemic exposure. Thus, the severity and frequency of adverse side effects associated with systemic exposure have been minimized. It has been proposed that inhaled remdesivir should be combined with the current IV treatment paradigm to realize greater potential antiviral activity against COVID-19.(7)Inhaled therapies can be administered by a wide range of well-established devices, including pressurized metered-dose inhalers, soft mist inhalers, dry powder inhalers, and nebulizers.(4) These devices are easy to use and are well tolerated by patients/caregivers after appropriate instruction for self administration or caregiver administration. Moreover, adaptations of some of these devices have been developed and approved for use in the hospital intensive care environment, where the patient may be receiving either noninvasive oxygen support or invasive mechanical ventilation for the severest disease symptom management.(8) The risk from infection due to administration of aerosols can be mitigated, and is lower than the infections due to asymptomatic virus-carrying people entering the hospital and breathing, talking, etc. without facemasks.(9) It follows that inhaled medication has the potential to be administered at all stages of an infection by a respiratory pathogen such as SARS-CoV-2, including pre- and postexposure prophylaxis, mild-to-moderate symptom presentation, and in severe disease. It is understood that appropriate personal protective equipment would be worn during inhaled aerosol administration to mitigate the risk of health care givers becoming infected during patient procedures by contact with exhaled virus particles.(10,11)In general, the current regulations in jurisdictions in which medicines are developed frequently take the approach of “one-size-fits-all.” However, the goal of new therapies targeted at the SARS-CoV-2 should be to provide each individual patient with a safe and efficacious treatment tailored to their specific needs. This strategy will likely require different categories of approval pathways based on differing risk/benefit ratios dependent on the disease severity. We assert that the wide variety of currently available devices already approved for inhaled therapy administration offers a large platform for this goal to be met.(12)The regulatory requirements and decisions should be made weighing carefully the therapeutic risk versus benefit for each type of product and patient population, rather than using the “one size fits all” approach. For example, we suggest the following approaches: (1)A last resort drug, for example, indicated for use in association with patients on mechanical ventilation, that is proven to be safe, should have a lower efficacy hurdle to be approved. For example, it is estimated that a treatment that could reduce mortality in severe COVID-19 patients by 20% would require a trial with >5000 subjects to meet the traditional regulatory standards for efficacy.(13) Clearly, given the impact of the lack of treatments for COVID-19 on the spreading of the infections and economic consequences of the lockdowns with all of the accompanying indirect health consequences, we need to explore urgently expedited development and approval paths (e.g., refs.(14–16)) rather than rely on the existing framework of pharmaceutical product development that would demand a trial size with very little prospect of rapid implementation, especially with many competing programs.(2)A therapy wherein the intended dose has been shown to operate at the plateau of the dose–response curve with good safety can accommodate wider quality control margins than those applied to inhaled products with a narrow therapeutic index. This consideration is important because the development of technologies that satisfy the existing very stringent quality control criteria for inhalation products according to the current regulations greatly increases the development time. Furthermore, the need is too urgent for such delays, in connection with treatment of COVID-19 patients.(3)Several of the inhaled therapy candidates in development are with new chemical entities and/or “repurposed” out-of-patent drugs that will be or have already been approved for other indications and administered by other routes of administration.(5) The systemic safety of such drugs is often already well documented, and the inhaled doses of these drugs required to achieve high lung concentrations are typically much lower than their daily doses by other routes. Nonetheless, the precise dosing strategy will depend on the pulmonary pharmacokinetics. As detailed in the new U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance,(17) Phase 1a clinical studies will still be required to establish pulmonary safety before evaluation of primary efficacy of the inhaled therapy. However, to shorten the extent and duration of Phase 1a studies and more rapidly enable dosing in a Phase 1b trial to establish dose and efficacy, existing and/or in silico physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling data could be leveraged to support laboratory and clinical studies.(18) We recommend that the relevant stakeholders should make the full benefit of that information and, in particular, review whether regulatory paths such as 505(b2)(19) can be modified to reflect the urgent need for COVID-19 therapies. This is an example where the prior safety data that the regulatory authorities already have in their possession may be used for the benefit of the society to expedite development.(4)In the current pandemic situation, the use of placebo controls should be judiciously reviewed, as this component adds greatly to the cost and duration of trials. One example of a mechanism to minimize the need for the extent of such control groups is to rapidly develop a global anonymized registry of all COVID-19 patients including placebo groups to be able to rapidly analyze the active groups in trials against each other, as well as the active groups against the large placebo groups.(5)Case–control studies of large population data bases stratified for all known risk factors would be extremely valuable. Such observational evaluations compare subjects who have an outcome (e.g., COVID-19) with subjects who do not have COVID-19, and look back retrospectively to compare whether the presence of a specific treatment is present in each group to determine the relationship between the treatment and the incidence of disease (i.e., COVID-19).(20) For example, the development and approval of prophylaxes require very large trials to obtain reliable information without access to information from all other such trials, as well as the natural progress of the infection and its COVID-19 manifestations.We believe that it is important from the outset to take a highly collaborative approach(21) between stakeholders (regulators and inhalation drug developers initially, supported by studies at the earliest opportunity involving patients and their caregivers) to share our collective knowledge to deliver therapies that have a high probability of having a favorable benefit/risk ratio in the target population.In summary, we request that decision makers and policy makers, in particular those involved in public health administration and the regulatory agencies, as well as those providers of funding sources who are considering how to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic in a timely manner, pay attention and act to access the, as yet, largely untapped potential for inhaled medication delivery to resolve the present urgent need.Furthermore, we hope that the exploration of the new paths to manage the SARS-CoV-2 health care risks and the experience gained will provide an expeditious path for development of new inhaled medications delivery for any future respiratory pathogen challenges as well.Author Disclosure StatementJ.P.M., S.C., M.B.D., G.H., S.L., H.M.M., C.D., and B.H. register no conflict of interest. D.C. is an employee of Insmed Incorporated. I.G. consults for companies developing potential inhaled prophylaxes and treatments for COVID-19 infections. A.C. is an employee of Aerogen Pharma Corporation, N.K. and M.N. consult for companies developing inhaled pharmaceutical products. A.B. served as principal investigator in studies sponsored by AbbVie, Allergan, Anthera, DCI, Cempra, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, National Institute of Health, Novartis, Therapeutic Development Network, Trudell Medical International, Vertex, and Vivus and he serves as science advisor to the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS). S.E. received unrestricted research grants, travel fee reimbursements, and speaker fees from Fisher and Paykel health care, consulting fees from La Diffusion Technique Française, consulting fees and unrestricted research grants from Aerogen Ltd., research support for Penn Century, and unrestricted research grant from Hamilton Medical. H.B. is a medical consultant including for Pulmoquine, a company investigating an inhaled therapy for prevention and treatment of COVID-19.Funding InformationNo funding was received by any of the authors for this article.References1. Smith DW, Frankel LR, Mathers LH, Tang ATS, Ariagno RS, and Prober CG: A controlled trial of aerosolized ribavirin in infants receiving mechanical ventilation for severe respiratory syncytial virus infection. NEJM. 1991;325:24–29. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2. Li L, Avery R, Budev M, Mossad S, and Danziger-Isakov L: Oral versus inhaled ribavirin therapy for respiratory syncytial virus infection after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012;31:839–844. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3. Hayden FG, Gubareva LV, Monto AS, Klein TC, Elliott MJ, Hammond JM, Sharp SJ, and Ossi MJ: Inhaled zanamivir for the prevention of influenza in families. NEJM. 2000;343:1282–1289. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4. Dolovich MB, Ahrens RC, Hess DR, Anderson P, Dhand R, Rau JL, Smaldone GC, Guyatt G, American College of Chest Physicians; and American College of Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology: Device selection and outcomes of aerosol therapy: Evidence-based guidelines: American College of Chest Physicians/American College of Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology. Chest. 2005;127:335–371. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5. Cipolla D, and Chan HK: Current and emerging inhaled therapies of repositioned drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;133:1–4. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6. De Castro JF, and Kumate J: Vaccination against measles: The situation in Mexico and America - Advances in the method of aerosol immunization. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 1990;47:449–461. Medline, Google Scholar7. Sun D: Remdesivir for treatment of COVID-19: Combination of pulmonary and IV administration may offer additional benefit. AAPS J. 2020;22:77. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8. Ari A, Fink JB, and Dhand R: Inhalation therapy in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: An update. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2012;25:319–332. Link, Google Scholar9. Li J: Evidence based recommendations on preventing nosocomial transmission for clinicians while taking care of coronavirus infected patients. ISAM Webinar 2020. https://www.isam.org/covid (accessed May 19, 2020). Google Scholar10. Ari A: Practical strategies for a safe and effective delivery of aerosolized medications to patients with COVID-19. Respir Med. 2020;167:105987. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11. Fink JB, Ehrmann S, Li J, Dailey P, McKiernan P, Darquenne C, Martin AR, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Kuehl PJ, Haeussermann S, MacLoughlin R, Smaldone GC, Mullinger B, Corcoran TE, and Dhand R: Reducing Aerosol-related risk of transmission in the era of COVID-19. A guidance endorsed by the International Society of Aerosols in Medicine. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2020 (Submitted). Google Scholar12. Laube B, Janssens HM, de Jongh HC, Devadason SG, Dhand R Diot P, Everard ML, Horvath I, Navalesi P, Voshaar T, and Chrystyn H: ERS/ISAM task force consensus statement: What the pulmonary specialist should know about the new inhalation therapies.Eur Respir J 2011;37:1308–1331. Google Scholar13. Landray M: Designing high-quality COVID-19 treatment trials: Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. 2020. https://www.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/briefing-room/webinars/designing-high-quality-covid-19-treatment-trials (accessed May 12, 2020). Google Scholar14. US Department of Health and Human Services: HIV/AIDS News: FDA grants accelerated approval for 3TC with AZT to treat AIDS. Nov 20, 1995. https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/news/203/fda-grants-accelerated-approval-for-3tc-with-azt-to-treat-aids (accessed May 11, 2020). Google Scholar15. Gilead Sciences Inc., Press Release—Oct 26, 2001. U.S. FDA Approves Gilead Sciences' Anti-HIV Drug Viread™. https://www.gilead.com/news-and-press/press-room/press-releases/2001/10/us-fda-approves-gilead-sciences-antihiv-drug-viread (accessed May 11, 2020). Google Scholar16. US Food and Drug Administration: Guidance for industry. Expedited programs for serious conditions—Drugs and biologics. 2014. https://www.fda.gov/media/86377/download (accessed May 11, 2020). Google Scholar17. US Food and Drug Administration: Guidance for Industry and Investigators. Covid-19 public health emergency: General considerations for pre-IND meeting requests for Covid-19 related drugs and biological products. 2020. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/covid-19-public-health-emergency-general-considerations-pre-ind-meeting-requests-covid-19-related (accessed May 15, 2020). Google Scholar18. Hassoun M, Malmlöf M, Scheibelhofer O, Kumar A, Bansal S, Selg E, Nowenwik M, Gerde P, Radivojev S, Paudel M, Arora S, and Forbes B: Use of PBPK modeling to evaluate the performance of DissolvIt, a biorelevant dissolution assay for orally inhaled drug products. Mol Pharmaceutics. 2019;16:1245–1254. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19. US Food and Drug Administration: Guidance for Industry. Determining whether to submit an ANDA or a 505(b)(2) application. 2019. https://www.fda.gov/media/124848/download (accessed May 11, 2020). Google Scholar20. Lewallen S, and Courtright P: Epidemiology in practice: Case-control studies. Community Eye Health. 1998;11:57–58. https://himmelfarb.gwu.edu/tutorials/studydesign101/casecontrols.cfm Medline, Google Scholar21. Tavernier E, Trinquart L, and Giraudeau B: Finding alternatives to the dogma of power-based sample size calculation: Is a fixed sample size prospective meta-experiment a potential alternative? PLoS One. 2016;11:e0158604. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarReviewed by:Gur Jai Pal SinghFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byInhalable chitosan-based hydrogel as a mucosal adjuvant for hydroxychloroquine in the treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a hamster modelJournal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, Vol. 56, No. 5Pooled evidence from preclinical and clinical studies for stem cell-based therapy in ARDS and COVID-1917 November 2022 | Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Vol. 478, No. 7A comprehensive overview of dry powder inhalers for pulmonary drug delivery: Challenges, advances, optimization techniques, and applicationsJournal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, Vol. 84Localized delivery of nanomedicine and antibodies for combating COVID-19Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, Vol. 13, No. 5Nasal sprays for treating COVID-19: a scientific note27 February 2023 | Pharmacological Reports, Vol. 75, No. 2Pulmonary drug delivery: an effective and convenient delivery route to combat COVID-1919 October 2022 | Drug Delivery and Translational Research, Vol. 13, No. 3Formulation, Device, and Clinical the Delivery of COVID-19 to the November 2022 | AAPS Vol. No. without the before the November 2020 | Journal of Clinical Vol. No. is highly active against respiratory including SARS-CoV-2 in May 2022 | & Vol. 11, No. and of as a COVID-19 J and October 2022 | Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Vol. No. inhalation of from a dose to by SARS-CoV-2 and of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, Vol. therapy for COVID-19: of and Journal of Vol. to and in May 2022 | in Vol. on the Therapeutic of in and inhaled and for and | Vol. No. for challenges to potential in COVID-19 Vol. 26, No. and of October | Vol. No. The potential of nanomedicine in the against of Vol. Aerosols for of | Vol. 13, No. Delivery for the and of COVID-19 | Vol. 13, No. in COVID-19 with emphasis on inhalation and of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, Vol. and for COVID-19 Pulmonary American Journal of the Medical Sciences, Vol. No. for of COVID-19 Michael and February | Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Vol. No. potential of medications to combat coronavirus Vol. 12, No. 2020 Inc., this P. Mitchell, Ariel Berlinski, Sebastian Canisius, David Cipolla, Myrna B. Dolovich, Igor Gonda, Guenther Hochhaus, Nani Kadrichu, Svetlana Lyapustina, Heidi M. Mansour, Chantal Darquenne, Andy R. Clark, Michael Newhouse, Stephan Ehrmann, Robert Humphries, and Homer Appeal from International Society for Aerosols in Medicine (ISAM) During COVID-19: Clinical Decision Makers and Governmental Agencies Should Consider the Inhaled Route of Administration: A Statement from the ISAM Regulatory and Standardization Issues Networking of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug in of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.052
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.094
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0520.094
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.006
Scholarly communication0.0130.007
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.1150.070
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery→Same topicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery→French-language works237,207→