MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037546789 · doi:10.1029/2020gc009155

Tungsten Isotope Composition of Archean Crustal Reservoirs and Implications for Terrestrial μ<sup>182</sup>W Evolution

2020· article· en· W3037546789 on OpenAlexaff
Jesse Reimink, Andrea Mundl‐Petermeier, Richard W. Carlson, Steven B. Shirey, R. J. Walker, D. Graham Pearson

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAustrian Science FundNational Science Foundation
KeywordsArcheanGeologyCratonGeochemistryMantle (geology)Continental crustCrustRadiogenic nuclideEarly EarthIsotopeHadeanSilicatePaleontologyTectonicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The evolution of Earth's major geochemical reservoirs over ~4.5 × 10 9 years remains a matter of intense study. Geochemical tools in the form of short‐lived radionuclide isotope ratios ( 142 Nd/ 144 Nd and 182 W/ 184 W) have expanded our understanding of the geochemical variability in both the modern and ancient Earth. Here, we present 142 Nd/ 144 Nd and 182 W/ 184 W data from a suite of rocks from the Slave craton that formed over a 1.1 × 10 9 year time span in the Archean. The rocks have consistently high 182 W/ 184 W, yet 142 Nd/ 144 Nd that is lower than bulk mantle and increased over time. The declining variability in 142 Nd/ 144 Nd with time likely reflects the homogenization of compositional heterogeneities in the silicate Earth that were initially created by differentiation events that occurred prior to 4.2 Ga. The elevated 182 W/ 184 W recorded in the Slave samples help refine models for the broader W‐isotope evolution of the silicate Earth. Globally, the Archean mantle that formed continental crust was dominated by 182 W/ 184 W elevated by some 10–15 ppm compared to the value for the modern upper mantle. The Slave craton lacks significant volumes of komatiite yet has elevated 182 W/ 184 W until 2.9 Ga. This observation, combined with the presence of other komatiite suites that have low 182 W/ 184 W, suggests that deep‐seated sources contributed low 182 W/ 184 W in the Archean Earth. The regional variability in 182 W/ 184 W may be explained by invoking chemical and/or isotopic exchange between a well‐mixed silicate Earth and the core or a portion of the lower mantle whose W‐isotope composition has been influenced by interaction with the core.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemistry Geophysics GeosystemsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207