MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Model Predictive Control of 5L-ANPC Converter-Fed PMSM Drives with Two-Stage Optimization

2020· article· en· W3037559591 on OpenAlexaff
Dehong Zhou, Li Ding, Zhongyi Quan, Yunwei Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Model predictive controlPulse-width modulationCapacitorVoltageDuty cycleRedundancy (engineering)Computer scienceConvertersTorqueEngineeringPhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Classical model predictive control (MPC) of a five-level active neutral-point-clamped (5L-ANPC) converter-fed PMSM drive faces two limitations: heavy computation burden and poor steady-state performance. This paper proposed an MPC scheme with two-stage optimization to reduce the computational burden and improve steady-state performance. To simplify the computational complexity, the 5L-ANPC converter is decoupled into two parts: the low-frequency cell (LFC) and the high-frequency cell (HFC). In the first stage, the switching states of the LFC are selected based on the sign of the desired output voltage; in the second stage, the optimal duty cycles for the high-frequency cell (HFC) are calculated by the multiple vector MPC. The pulse train for each switching state is generated by phase-shifted pulse-width modulation (PS-PWM) based on the voltage-second balance principle. The phase capacitor and DClink capacitor voltage balance are achieved by the flexibility of the inherent redundancy in the 5L-ANPC converter. An efficient optimization method is also formulated to reduce the classical enumeration algorithm to only 6 times, which significantly simplifies the computational burden of MPC. Due to the interleaved switching manner within each phase, the steady-state performance compared with well the linear controller with PSPWM. Experimental evaluations have been presented to validate the effectiveness of the proposed MPC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207