MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037611325 · doi:10.4103/cjrm.cjrm_33_20

Rural and Remote 2020

2020· article· en· W3037611325 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Peter Hutten‐Czapski

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Rural Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Rural area2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Rural healthMedicineEconomic growthGeographySocioeconomicsDiseaseVirologySociologyEconomicsInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author discusses the cancellation of the 2020 annual Rural and Remote Conference of the Society of Rural Physicians of Canada (SRPC) scheduled in Ottawa, Ontario due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic Topics explored include the possible peak of the pandemic in Canada by the end of April 2020, the respiratory clinic set up by the SRPC for testing possible COVID-19 patients, and the adjustment of the rural health sector to address the impact of the pandemic

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1200.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Rural MedicineSame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207