Multi-Antenna Two-Way Relay Based Cooperative NOMA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate a non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) assisted multi-antenna two-way relay system, where multi-antenna users apply NOMA to support bidirectional superposition transmission via multiple multi-antenna relays. Specifically, we propose two cooperative strategies, namely multiple-access broadcast NOMA and time division broadcast NOMA. For each of the two cooperative strategies, we devise a joint antenna-and-relay selection scheme to enhance the transmission reliability. Analytical expressions for the outage probability and diversity order are derived to evaluate the system performance achieved by the proposed cooperative strategies with the corresponding joint antenna-and-relay selection schemes. To further reduce the outage probability, we use the derived analytical results as objective functions to optimize the transmit power allocation under both cooperative strategies. Finally, extensive simulations are carried out to validate the accuracy of the derived analytical results. Our simulation results indicate that the proposed strategies significantly outperform existing benchmark strategies in terms of outage probability and diversity order.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it