MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037622046 · doi:10.4000/books.apu.4821

Une traductrice révolutionnaire en 1830 : Madame de Rochmondet

2012· book-chapter· fr· W3037622046 on OpenAlexaff
Benoît Léger

Bibliographic record

VenueArtois Presses Université eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Il importe peu que les Études sur la traduction de l’anglais, ou Lessons on the French Translation par une certaine « Madame G.M.*** de Rochmondet » aient paru avant ou après les Trois Glorieuses, sous la Restauration ou sous la Monarchie de Juillet, le travail proposé par Rochmondet est de nature révolutionnaire, tant par son contenu que par la pensée traductive qui le caractérise. Il importe tout aussi peu que cette angliciste ait disparu de l’Histoire : les Études tracent le ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtois Presses Université eBooksSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207