MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3037650252 · doi:10.4000/culturemusees.4871

La vie intime des objets culturels

2020· article· fr· W3037650252 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey T. Schnapp

Bibliographic record

VenueCulture & Musées · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppropriationHumanitiesDocumentationSociologyArtPhilosophyComputer scienceEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’auteur envisage la transmission du patrimoine et de l’histoire à travers les processus de numérisation des archives et des objets culturels. Il examine de manière critique la construction des notices et plus largement de la documentation associée à la numérisation de ces collections. Il considère la division entre big et small data au sein des données en sciences humaines, ainsi que les représentations de l’histoire qui en sont issues. Il conclut à trois enjeux de la numérisation : elle réduit la complexité d’un objet culturel ; elle crée des modes d’appropriation et de transformation pour les publics ; elle est à penser dans une approche multimédia englobante.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0100.028
Scholarly communication0.0250.019
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.259
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.056 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCulture & MuséesSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207